<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Hartog&#039;s Den &#187; wine tastings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hartogsden.com/archives/tag/wine-tastings/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hartogsden.com</link>
	<description>Underdamped and Dangerous</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2011 19:43:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<copyright>Copyright &#xA9; Hartog's Den 2010 </copyright>
	<managingEditor>quantumcowboy@gmail.com (Hartog&#039;s Den)</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>quantumcowboy@gmail.com (Hartog&#039;s Den)</webMaster>
	
	<itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:summary>Underdamped and Dangerous</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:category text="Society &#38; Culture" />
	<itunes:author>Hartog&#039;s Den</itunes:author>
	<itunes:owner>
		<itunes:name>Hartog&#039;s Den</itunes:name>
		<itunes:email>quantumcowboy@gmail.com</itunes:email>
	</itunes:owner>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://www.hartogsden.com/wp-content/plugins/podpress/images/powered_by_podpress_large.jpg" />
		<item>
		<title>El Dorado Wine Country</title>
		<link>http://www.hartogsden.com/archives/264</link>
		<comments>http://www.hartogsden.com/archives/264#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 17:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nalin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[food and wine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wine tastings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hartogsden.com/?p=264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oops, probably should have published this awhile ago&#8230; found a post in the drafts queue that seems to be at least a partial transcription from some notes I took on a tour of El Dorado County&#8217;s wineries last year.  For what it&#8217;s worth, enjoy. For reference, my personal wine rating system can be described thus. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops, probably should have published this awhile ago&#8230; found a post in the drafts queue that seems to be at least a partial transcription from some notes I took on a tour of El Dorado County&#8217;s wineries last year.  For what it&#8217;s worth, enjoy.</p>
<p>For reference, my personal wine rating system can be described thus. Ratings of 1-3 indicate a pretty terrible wine. A rating of &#8217;1&#8242; I would discard immediately, regardless of the social consequences.  A rating of &#8217;3&#8242; I would find a way to politely not finish it or get rid of it.  A &#8217;4&#8242;  I would finish if it would be impolite or socially disadvantageous to discard.  A &#8217;5&#8242; is decent and drinkable without compliment or complaint.  Ratings &#8217;6&#8242; through &#8217;8&#8242; are good wines, a &#8217;9&#8242; is excellent, and a &#8217;10&#8242; usually means I bought a case on the spot and signed up for the newsletter telling me when next year&#8217;s batch will be released.</p>
<p>And, for my fellow engineering nerds, I do in fact have it all in a spreadsheet.  Many interesting bits of data mining can be had.  But the one I will share is that, overall, there is a weak linear correlation between cost and personal rating, though the r-squared coefficient is only about 0.65.<em><br />
</em></p>
<p><em>Obscurity Cellars (Fair Play, CA) 2003 Barbera. Moderately sweet and sharp, medium-heavy body, excellent aroma.  Paired it with a juicy burger.  $16/bottle. Rating 7.</em></p>
<p><em>D&#8217;Arie (Shenandoah Valley, CA) 2006 Primitivo.  Medium body, smoky but with a mellow finish.  Would go excellently with any BBQ&#8217;ed meat! $20/bottle.  Rating 8.</em></p>
<p><em>Toogood Winery (Fair Play, CA) 2007 Sauvignon Blanc.  Sweet, light, and peachy; good, but not exceptional.  $14/bottle. Rating 6.5.</em></p>
<p><em>Toogood Winery (Fair Play, CA) Loquacious Rosetta III. Very sweet, and a little tart. BRIGHT red fruit flavors.  $14/bottle.  Rating 7.</em></p>
<p><em>Toogood Winery (Fair Play, CA) Who&#8217;s Your Dude.  Impressive boldness, but too sharp for my taste.  $20/bottle.  Rating 6.</em></p>
<p><em>Toogood Winery (Fair Play, CA) Red Mutt III.  Slightly sharp, overall not that interesting. $24/bottle. Rating 5.</em></p>
<p><em>Toogood Winery (Fair Play, CA) 2006 Tempranillo.  Good balance of sharp and sweet.  Definitely acidic, but not overly so.  Could pair with strong flavors.  $36/bottle.  Rating 6.5.</em></p>
<p><em>Toogood Winery (Fair Play, CA) Sangiovese. Moderately sweet but remains mellow on the finish.  Lacking the sharpness of most Toogood wines, which is a plus in my book.  Overall a good wine, but lingers a bit too long, which reduces the final positive impression.  $22/bottle. Rating 7.</em></p>
<p><em>Toogood Winery (Fair Play, CA) 2006 Alicante Bouschet. A difficult grape to time due to the high tannins.  Very bold wine with a beautiful core taste and aroma.  I&#8217;d prefer it a little less sharp (my eternal complaint), but despite this a very pleasant wine. $52/bottle. Rating 8.</em></p>
<p><em>Château Fleur-de-Lys (Somerset, CA) 2007 Viognier.  Pleasantly and slighly sweet, a delight of yellow fruit flavors.  $19/bottle. Rating 7.</em></p>
<p><em>Château Fleur-de-Lys (Somerset, CA) 2007 Chardonnay. Subtle, elegant, dry, and the barest hint of buttery French oak.  This is everything a chardonnay should be, missing only a bit more body.  I bought one on the spot. $17/bottle. Rating 9.</em></p>
<p><em>Château Fleur-de-Lys (Somerset, CA) 2005 Mourvèdre. Medium-bodied, fruity, on the dry end with understated sweetness of black cherries and dark fruit.  Rich Provençale style.  Rating 8.</em></p>
<p><em>Château Fleur-de-Lys (Somerset, CA) 2005 Petit Syrah.  A little too much on the tannins for my preference, with a somewhat flat finish.  Good deep flavor though, maybe something to pair with a heavy, meaty meal.  Seems like it could use a good aging to bring out more of its potential.  &#8220;Many awards&#8221;??? Not my favorite.  Rating 6.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hartogsden.com/archives/264/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

